MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210599995 · doi:10.7224/1537-2073-23.1.iv

Editorial

2021· editorial· es· W4210599995 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
François Béthoux

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of MS Care · 2021
Typeeditorial
Languagees
FieldMedicine
TopicTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGratitudeMedicineTheme (computing)Health carePandemicEditorial boardPublic relationsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Library sciencePolitical scienceLawPsychologyDiseasePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The start of the much-awaited year 2021 unfortunately calls for an adjustment of our expectations regarding the COVID-19 pandemic, which continues to affect all of us, and in a disproportionate manner the most vulnerable amongst us. I have read on social media calls to “please cancel my subscription to 2021.” There are nonetheless tangible reasons to be hopeful, such as our growing understanding of the SARS CoV-2 virus and the rolling out of vaccines.The International Journal of MS Care has received a record number of submissions in 2020. I am extremely grateful to the authors who entrust us with their manuscripts, and to our reviewers, whose names can be found in our last issue of 2020. I also want to extend my gratitude to our editorial board members, to the IJMSC editorial team, and to the leadership of the Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers (CMSC). We have all worked harder in 2020, despite many hurdles, to continue informing comprehensive MS care with evidence from around the world. Our international reach at the same time transcends and incorporates differences in health care systems, cultures, and beliefs in the management of MS. Our 2020 theme issue brought perspectives from our European partner organization Rehabilitation in Multiple Sclerosis (RIMS). Our first issue of 2021 features articles from Australia, Canada, Iran, the United Kingdom, and the United States, and international abstracts from the 10th International Symposium on Gait and Balance in Multiple Sclerosis (see the online version of this issue for full information).I am glad to feature the literature review by Mayo et al as our first continuing education article for 2021. What would be the use of building intricate, multidisciplinary, evidence-based care processes if our patients cannot access them? As an unexpected silver lining, the pandemic has forced health care systems to broaden options for remote access to health care through online visits and remote monitoring. Yet barriers remain, and the authors provide us with evidence regarding access facilitators that can be used to implement real-world initiatives.I will not disclose how much weight I have gained since the beginning of the pandemic, but I know it is related to lower physical activity (and easy access to snacks when I work from home). Baird et al provide us with a framework, based on social cognitive theory, to promote physical activity in older adults with MS, a growing subgroup of our patients with concomitantly higher prevalence of comorbidities and lower activity levels. Broadening our choices for eccentric exercise modalities, the pilot study by Psarakis et al demonstrates the safety and feasibility of backward downhill treadmill training in individuals with mild-to-moderate disability from MS and ankle contractures.Advocacy for specialized multidisciplinary MS care needs to be supported by evidence of its value to patients, their loved ones, and society. Furthermore, evidence is needed to operationalize multidisciplinary care in the context of health care cost containment, and a decreasing workforce in some parts of the world. The articles from Punshon et al and May et al contribute to this effort with regard to MS specialist nurses and clinical pharmacists, respectively.Using the same measurement tools facilitates the comparison of care outcomes and research findings, as well as the conduct of meta-analyses. To be used in various parts the world, self-report health questionnaires need to go through a rigorous process of translation, cultural adaptation, and validation. Behrangrad and Yoosefinejad present elements of validation for three well-known fatigue scales in Persian.While our attention is focused on the COVID-19 pandemic, the ongoing tuberculosis (TB) epidemic affected about 10 million people worldwide in 2019 according to the World Health Organization. Latent TB (a positive TB test without active TB infection) raises a concern for potential disease reactivation with some disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for MS. Because many patients are already on a DMT at the time of testing, clinicians need to be aware that some DMTs may affect testing results. This is illustrated in the article from Bouley et al, who observed a higher occurrence of indeterminate interferon-gamma release assay results in patients on dimethyl fumarate.Please accept our team’s most sincere wishes of happiness and good health for 2021.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.360 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of MS CareSame topicTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationFrench-language works237,207