Adaptive Implicit Inverse Control for a Class of Butterfly-Like Hysteretic Nonlinear Systems and Its Application to Dielectric Elastomer Actuators
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this article, a butterfly-like Prandtl–Ishlinskii (PI) hysteresis model and a novel neural network based adaptive implicit inverse control scheme to describe and control the butterfly-like hysteresis are proposed. The main contributions are: 1) a butterfly-like PI model is developed for the purpose of predicting the hysteresis effects and the model is feasible for controller design; 2) an implicit inverse control scheme especially for mitigating the butterfly-like hysteresis is implemented, which avoids the construction of the direct inverse of the butterfly-like PI model; 3) an adaptive implicit inverse control approach, which integrates the neural network and the implicit inverse technique into the output-feedback control is developed for eliminating the butterfly-like hysteresis and an arbitrarily small$L_{\infty }$norm of tracking error is achieved. The proposed modeling and control methods are validated experimentally via the dielectric elastomer actuator based motion control platform.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".