MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210608966 · doi:10.20396/modos.v6i1.8667204

Histórias entrelaçadas

2022· article· pt· W4210608966 on OpenAlex
Juliana Ribeiro da Silva Bevilacqua

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMODOS Revista de História da Arte · 2022
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLiterature, Culture, and Criticism
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O artigo tem por objetivo apresentar um panorama histórico das exposições de arte africana realizadas no MASP bem como tecer algumas considerações sobre as coleções africanas presentes em seu acervo. Apesar de o Museu de Arte de São Paulo ser reconhecido por sua coleção de arte europeia, essa instituição sediou e também organizou exposições de arte africana, além de ter constituído coleções. As exposições de arte africana realizadas no MASP podem ser entendidas basicamente, mas não exclusivamente, a partir de três perspectivas distintas: aquelas que respondiam a interesses privados, como é o caso da mostra Arte Negra (1953) e também daquela que exibiu a coleção africana do Bank Boston em 1976; as relacionadas à política de aproximação entre Brasil e África durante a ditadura militar no país, como é o caso de Arte Tradicional da Costa do Marfim (1974) e Arte Contemporânea do Senegal (1981); aquelas que exploravam a herança dos africanos no Brasil e estavam apoiadas na tese de fluxo e refluxo do tráfico de escravos, de autoria de Pierre Verger, cuja maior representante é África Negra (1988).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.543
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0440.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it