The Sinorhizobium meliloti Nitrogen Stress Response Changes Radically in the Face of Concurrent Phosphate Stress
Bibliographic record
Abstract
genes changed more than two-fold in response to either nitrogen or phosphate limitation. When these two stresses were applied together, stress responsive gene expression shifted dramatically. In particular, the nitrogen stress response in the presence of phosphate stress had only 30 of about 350 genes in common with the 280 genes that responded to nitrogen stress with adequate phosphate. Expression of sRNAs was also altered in response to these stresses. 82% of genes that responded to nitrogen stress also responded to phosphate stress, including 20 sRNAs. A subset of these sRNAs is known to be chaperoned by the RNA binding protein, Hfq. Hfq had previously been shown to influence about a third of the genes that responded to both nitrogen and phosphate stresses. Phosphate limitation influenced changes in gene expression more than nitrogen limitation and, when both stresses were present, phosphate stress sometimes reversed the direction of some of the changes induced by nitrogen stress. These nutrient stress responses are therefore context dependent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".