MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4210621257 · doi:10.5489/cuaj.7760

Canadian Urological Association guideline: Management of small renal masses – Summary of recommendations

2022· article· en· W4210621257 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Patrick O. Richard, Philippe D. Violette, Bimal Bhindi, Rodney H. Breau, Wassim Kassouf, Luke T. Lavallée, Michael Jewett, John R. Kachura, Anil Kapoor, Maxine Noel-Lamy, Michael Ordon, Stephen E Pautler, Frédéric Pouliot, Alan So, Ricardo Rendon, Simon Tanguay, Christine A. Collins, Maryam Kandi, Bobby Shayegan, Andrew E. Weller, Antonio Finelli

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Urological Association Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal cell carcinoma treatment
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer AgencyCentre hospitalier universitaire de QuébecSt. Michael's HospitalSt. Joseph’s Healthcare HamiltonUniversity of CalgaryPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreMcMaster UniversityMcGill University Health CentreUniversity of OttawaWestern UniversityUniversity of TorontoCapital District Health AuthorityUniversity Health NetworkHamilton Health SciencesKidney Foundation of CanadaCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGuidelineAssociation (psychology)MedicineUrologyPsychologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.723
Threshold uncertainty score0.550

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.004
Bibliometrics0.0060.005
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0070.002
Research integrity0.0090.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes3
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Urological Association Journal→Same topicRenal cell carcinoma treatment→French-language works237,207→