Static magnetic stimulation induces structural plasticity at the axon initial segment of inhibitory cortical neurons
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Static magnetic stimulation (SMS) is a form of non-invasive brain stimulation that can alter neural activity and induce neural plasticity that outlasts the period of stimulation. While SMS is typically delivered for short periods (e.g., 10 minutes) to alter corticospinal excitability or motor behaviours, the plasticity mechanisms that can be induced with longer periods of stimulation have not been explored. In mammalian neurons, the axon initial segment (AIS) is the site of action potential initiation and undergoes structural plasticity as a homeostatic mechanism to counteract chronic changes in neuronal activity. Therefore, we investigated whether the chronic application of SMS would induce structural AIS plasticity in cortical neurons. SMS (0.5 Tesla in intensity) was delivered to postnatally derived mouse primary cortical neurons consisting of mainly inhibitory neurons, for 6 or 48 hours beginning from 7 days in vitro (DIV7). AIS structural plasticity (length and starting distance from the soma) was quantified immediately after and 24 hours post-stimulation. Following 6 hours of stimulation, we observed an immediate decrease in median AIS length compared to control, that persisted to 24 hours post stimulation. In addition, there was a distal shift in the AIS start position relative to the soma that was only observed 24 hours after the 6-hour stimulation. Following 48 hours of stimulation, we observed an immediate shortening of AIS length and a distal shift in AIS start position relative to the soma, however only the distal shift in AIS start position persisted to 24 hours post-stimulation. Our findings provide the foundation to expand the use of SMS to more chronic applications as a method to study or promote AIS plasticity non-invasively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".