MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210633174 · doi:10.4000/glad.3124

La fabrique des archives : le point de vue des archivistes des Archives départementales d’Indre-et-Loire à propos du fonds Menie Grégoire

2021· article· fr· W4210633174 on OpenAlexaff
Mathilde Sergent-Mirebault

Bibliographic record

VenueGLAD! · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFrench Historical and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsLibrary and Archives Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le fonds d’archives Menie Grégoire (66J) est aujourd’hui conservé aux Archives départementales d’Indre-et-Loire. Entre 1967 et 1981, la journaliste et animatrice radiophonique Menie Grégoire a construit un espace de parole et d’écoute sur les ondes de RTL mais aussi dans la boite aux lettres de la radio où les témoignages de femmes, et parfois d’hommes, arrivaient par dizaines. Plus de 80 000 lettres et de 2000 bandes sonores magnétiques sont conservées et accessibles au public. Ces archives constituent aujourd’hui dans le champ de l’histoire sociale et des études du genre des traces inédites du langage quotidien des femmes qui s’expriment à une période singulière où la parole des femmes se libère sur des sujets tels que la contraception, la sexualité, l’exploitation par le travail domestique et reproductif, la retraite, l’éducation des enfants, etc. Ces archives renseignent aussi sur les dispositifs d’information, de communication et de mobilisation à l’œuvre dans une société donnée (correspondances épistolaires et témoignages radiophoniques). Pour cet article, nous avons souhaité donner la parole aux archivistes du service d’Archives départementales qui conservent ce fonds afin de remonter le fil et les traces de cette histoire d’archives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.132
Threshold uncertainty score0.262

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0060.006
Science and technology studies0.0250.025
Scholarly communication0.0160.011
Open science0.0020.010
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGLAD!Same topicFrench Historical and Cultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207