MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4210635185 · doi:10.1101/2022.02.02.478844

A novel hidden Markov approach to studying dynamic functional connectivity states in human neuroimaging

2022· preprint· en· W4210635185 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Sana Hussain, Jason Langley, Aaron R. Seitz, Xiaoping Hu, Megan A. K. Peters

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Dental and Craniofacial ResearchNational Institute on AgingNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchNational Institute of Mental HealthUniversity of Southern CaliforniaNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsNeuroimagingComputer scienceDynamic functional connectivityHidden Markov modelFunctional magnetic resonance imagingFunctional connectivityResting state fMRIArtificial intelligenceMarkov chainMachine learningPattern recognition (psychology)NeurosciencePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Hidden Markov models are a popular choice to extract and examine recurring patterns of activity or functional connectivity in neuroimaging data, both in terms of spatial patterns and their temporal progression. Although many diverse hidden Markov models have been applied to neuroimaging data, most have defined states based on activity levels (intensity-based states) rather than patterns of functional connectivity between brain areas (connectivity-based states), which is problematic if we want to understand connectivity dynamics: intensity-based states are unlikely to provide comprehensive information about dynamic connectivity patterns. Methods We addressed this problem by introducing a new hidden Markov model that defines states based on full functional connectivity profiles among brain regions. We empirically explored the behavior of this new model in comparison to existing approaches based on intensity-based or summed functional connectivity states using the HCP unrelated 100 functional magnetic resonance imaging “resting state” dataset. Results Our ‘full functional connectivity’ model discovered connectivity states with more distinguishable (i.e., unique and separable from each other) patterns than previous approaches, and recovered simulated connectivity-based states more faithfully than the other models tested. Discussion Thus, if our goal is to extract and interpret connectivity states in neuroimaging data, our new model outperforms previous methods which miss crucial information about the evolution of functional connectivity in the brain. Impact statement Hidden Markov models can be used to investigate brain states noninvasively. Previous models “recover” connectivity from intensity-based hidden states, or from connectivity ‘summed’ across nodes. Here we introduce a novel connectivity-based hidden Markov model and show how it can reveal true connectivity hidden states under minimal assumptions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies→French-language works237,207→