MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210637023 · doi:10.1049/pbpo169e_ch7

Blade element analysis and design of horizontal-axis turbines

2021· book-chapter· en· W4210637023 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitution of Engineering and Technology eBooks · 2021
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTurbomachinery Performance and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHorizontal axisElement (criminal law)Vertical axisBlade (archaeology)GeologyStructural engineeringEngineeringMarine engineeringEngineering drawingPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chapter Contents: 7.1 Introduction 7.2 Horizontal-axis wind and hydrokinetic turbines 7.3 Cavitation on hydrokinetic turbines 7.4 Blade element momentum theory 7.4.1 Axial momentum theory 7.4.2 Including the angular momentum 7.4.3 Blade element theory 7.4.4 Prandtl tip loss factor 7.4.5 Finite blade functions 7.5 Angular and axial momentum theory with a diffuser 7.5.1 Correction for finite number of blades 7.6 Blade element theory for diffuser-augmented turbines 7.6.1 High thrust correction 7.7 The accuracy of blade element momentum theory 7.8 Design using blade element momentum theory 7.8.1 Bare wind turbines 7.8.2 Bare hydrokinetic turbines 7.8.3 For turbines with diffuser 7.9 Conclusions References

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.913
Threshold uncertainty score0.930

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it