MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

St. John’s Freehold

2021· book-chapter· en· W4210638975 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ruth M. Mitchell, Henry M. Miller, Garry Wheeler Stone

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Press of Florida eBooks · 2021
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFreeholdQuarter (Canadian coin)ServantFish <Actinopterygii>ArchaeologyStyle (visual arts)GeographyArchitectureFishingAncient historyHistoryFisheryEngineeringLawBiologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The first seventeenth-century site excavated by Historic St. Mary’s City was St. John’s Plantation, established in 1638. In this chapter, evidence of the four structures uncovered at the site is presented. These include a well-built hall-and-parlor home based upon East Anglian architecture, and three subsequent earthfast buildings. One was a store converted into a servant’s quarter and then a kitchen, another was built as a merchant’s storehouse which became a lodging, and the third was a poultry house constructed in a Dutch style. Analysis of animal bones from the site is also presented. Bones from the first decades of occupation are compared with those from later decades, revealing a dramatic shift in the diet of the inhabitants over time. Although domestic cattle and swine were significant throughout, wild species especially deer and fish had a prominent place in the early diet. By the late 1600s, domestic meats, especially beef, predominated. This provided the first detailed archaeological insights about the diet from the seventeenth-century Chesapeake.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.092
Threshold uncertainty score0.307

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0920.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity Press of Florida eBooksSame topicHistorical and Cultural Archaeology StudiesFrench-language works237,207