MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210657411 · doi:10.1002/vrc2.292

Long‐term mechanical ventilation of an 8‐week‐old dog with idiopathic polyradiculoneuritis

2022· article· en· W4210657411 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Abraham Calero Rodríguez, Hugo van Oostrom, Janny C. de Grauw

Bibliographic record

VenueVeterinary Record Case Reports · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPeripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAnesthesiaMidazolamPropofolHypoventilationVentilation (architecture)Mechanical ventilationDexmedetomidineSedationRespiratory system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A 2‐month‐old labrador retriever diagnosed with progressive polyradiculoneuritis was anaesthetised and mechanically ventilated with the aid of pressure control ventilation due to severe hypoventilation and hypoxaemia. Anaesthesia was maintained with propofol and midazolam constant‐rate infusions (CRIs). Over time, once the patient was showing spontaneous breathing attempts and arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide was within normal range, ventilatory mode was switched to pressure support ventilation. The anaesthetic protocol was modified to maintain an appropriate level of anaesthesia with a minimum amount of fluid administered. The midazolam CRI was substituted by a sufentanil CRI, followed by a change to a dexmedetomidine CRI. An intensive nursing care protocol was established. Intermittent hyperthermia and peripheral oedema were the main complications observed. Ventilatory support was reduced until the patient was successfully weaned from the ventilator at the third attempt, after 116 hours of ventilatory support.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0040.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVeterinary Record Case ReportsSame topicPeripheral Neuropathies and DisordersFrench-language works237,207