MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

TO THE 80TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE LIBERATION OF KALININ. RECOGNITION OF THE DEAD 81 SOLDIERS 243 SD ACCORDING TO THE SPATIO-TEMPORAL DATA OF ARCHIVAL DOCUMENTS

2021· article· ru· W4210671826 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Владимир Геннадьевич Щекотилов, Олег Евгеньевич Лазарев, Мария Владимировна Шалаева, Светлана Николаевна Щекотилова

Bibliographic record

VenueВестник Тверского государственного университета Серия География и геоэкология · 2021
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCentral European and Russian historical studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOffensiveChristian ministryQuarter (Canadian coin)HistoryOperations researchDatabaseComputer sciencePolitical scienceLawEngineeringArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Представлены результаты практической апробации предложенной методики подготовки обоснования для признания погибшими воинов, пропавших без вести. Методика основывается на использовании ГИС с архивными и современными картами, а также архивных материалов из базы данных системы «Память народа» и Центрального архива Министерства обороны. Около четверти из общего числа воинов, признанных погибшими, воевала в 243 сд[54], которая вела оборонительные и наступательные бои в 1941-1942 гг. в районе г. Ржев и г. Калинин. The results of the practical approbation of the proposed methodology for the preparation of a justification for the recognition of dead missing soldiers are presented. The methodology is based on the use of GIS with archival and modern maps, as well as archival materials from the database of the system "Memory of the People" and the Central Archive of the Ministry of Defense. About a quarter of the soldiers recognized as dead fought in 243 sd, which conducted defensive and offensive battles in 1941-1942 in the area of Rzhev and Kalinin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.223
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0050.004
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueВестник Тверского государственного университета Серия География и геоэкологияSame topicCentral European and Russian historical studiesFrench-language works237,207