MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210685335 · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3146386

A Wearable Circularly Polarized Antenna Backed by AMC Reflector for WBAN Communications

2022· article· en· W4210685335 on OpenAlexafffund
Youcef Braham Chaouche, Mourad Nedil, Ismail Ben Mabrouk, Omar M. Ramahi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Abitibi-TémiscamingueUniversity of Waterloo
FundersFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les TechnologiesInstitut national de la recherche scientifique
KeywordsTurnstileComputer scienceTopology (electrical circuits)PhysicsElectrical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new flexible circularly polarized (CP) wearable antenna is proposed for Wireless Body-Area Network systems (WBAN) operating at 5.8 GHz. The circular polarization is enabled by combining a microstrip-line monopole feed and an inverted L-shaped conformal metal strip extended from a coplanar waveguide. The proposed antenna shows satisfactory performance in terms of gain and specific absorption rate (SAR) at a separation of 12 mm from a human body model. To minimize body-antenna separation, a flexible$2 \times 2$artificial magnetic conductor (AMC) was used as a reflector to achieve good performances in terms of gain and SAR. The total footprint of the proposed antenna is only$34.4\times34.4$mm2($0.384 \lambda _{0}^{2}$) board of semi-flexible Rogers RT-Duroid 5880 substrate. The final design provides a peak gain of 7.6 dBi and an efficiency of 94.7% when worn on the body. Furthermore, evaluation results indicate that the maximum SAR level decreased by up to 20.42% in comparison with the CP antenna without the AMC. Full-wave EM simulation and experimental results are performed, both in free space and proximity to the human body under different bending scenarios. Overall, the proposed antenna performance has been shown to be robust to structural deformation along the x-axis in comparison to previously reported designs. These features demonstrate that the proposed antenna is a strong candidate for off-body wearable applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations57
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicAntenna Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207