MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210688438 · doi:10.1016/j.apjon.2022.01.006

Addressing the global pediatric oncology nursing workforce gap: An overdue imperative

2022· editorial· en· W4210688438 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Julia Challinor

Bibliographic record

VenueAsia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing · 2022
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorkforceMedicineGlobal healthPer capitaPediatric oncologyPediatric cancerPopulationHealth careCancerChildhood cancerEconomic growthFamily medicineNursingEnvironmental healthPublic healthInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Effective childhood cancer care requires a specialized pediatric oncology nursing workforce. Childhood cancer is an increasing pediatric disease burden worldwide1 as mortality from common infectious diseases is successfully addressed. Treatment for cancer is now available in most countries. Even in Africa, a continent with the lowest per capita GDP,2 most countries have facilities that offer pediatric oncology treatment.3

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.026
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.163

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.026
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.005
Scholarly communication0.0100.020
Open science0.0030.018
Research integrity0.0130.022
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0490.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.440
Teacher spread0.361 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsia-Pacific Journal of Oncology NursingSame topicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeFrench-language works237,207