« Les Perdants » : aux fondements historiques de la culture stratégique contemporaine de la société québécoise
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le concept de culture stratégique est l’une des passerelles qui permettent de lier l’histoire et la science politique, en rappelant combien la mémoire d’évènements passés peut déterminer la perception du présent. Mais cette mémoire est sélective, sujette aux oublis comme aux surexpositions. Ce texte est une relecture de certains fondements historiques de la culture stratégique de la société québécoise contemporaine, fortement teintée de l’internationalisme de Pearson, qui est souvent confondu avec du « pacifisme. » Il vise à démontrer de cette culture stratégique est en partie tributaire d’un oubli, soit la période de guerre endémique sévissant en Amérique du Nord à l’époque de la Nouvelle-France, et d’une surexposition, soit la défaite des Plaines d’Abraham en 1759, dont le souvenir encore douloureux pourrait avoir imprimer, dans la mémoire collective des Québécois, l’idée selon laquelle la guerre est une aventure qui risque d’aboutir à une grande catastrophe.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".