MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210692698 · doi:10.1177/03000605221075814

Spinal intradural schwannoma presenting with acute subarachnoid hemorrhage: a case report and review of published reports

2022· article· en· W4210692698 on OpenAlexaff
Dongao Zhang, Tao Fan, Wayne Fan, Yinqian Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of International Medical Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCapital Health Research and Development of Special FundBeijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission
KeywordsMedicineLumbar punctureCerebrospinal fluidLumbarSubarachnoid hemorrhageSchwannomaMagnetic resonance imagingNeck painIntracranial HypotensionSurgeryPresentation (obstetrics)RadiologyAnesthesiaPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Acute subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) presentation is a very rare occurrence in spinal schwannomas. We report a case of lumbar schwannoma in a patient presenting first with acute SAH. A 40-year-old man was referred to our department 7 days after the sudden onset of headache, neck pain, and fever. SAH was suspected; however, head computed tomography (CT) findings were normal. A lumbar puncture indicated blood-stained cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Moreover, the CSF pressure changed from 200 mmH 2 O to 90 mmH 2 O after drainage of 10 mL of CSF indicating a blockage of CSF. Subsequent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirmed an intradural tumor with SAH, which also caused blockage of the CSF circulation. The patient underwent immediate surgery and fully recovered. In conclusion, the early diagnosis and total removal of the tumor and blood clot significantly improved the patient’s outcome. There is a high index of suspicion for spinal tumors resulting in SAH when there is a CSF pressure change after lumbar puncture in an SAH patient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.412
Teacher spread0.381 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of International Medical ResearchSame topicSpinal Fractures and Fixation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207