Development of the Food Label Information Program: A Comprehensive Canadian Branded Food Composition Database
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Traditional methods for creating food composition databases struggle to cope with the large number of products and the rapid pace of turnover in the food supply. This paper introduces Food Label Information Program (FLIP), a big data approach to the evaluation of the Canadian food supply and presents the latest methods used in the development of this database. METHODS: The Food Label Information Program (FLIP) is a database of Canadian food and beverage package labels by brand name. The latest iteration of the FLIP, FLIP 2020, was developed using website "scraping" to collect food labeling information (e.g., nutritional composition, price, product images, ingredients, brand, etc.) on all foods and beverages available on seven major Canadian e-grocery retailer websites between May 2020 and February 2021. RESULTS: The University of Toronto's Food Label Information Program (FLIP) 2020 was developed in three phases: Phase 1, database development and enhancements; Phase 2, data capture and management of food products and nutrition information; Phase 3, data processing and food categorizing. A total of 74,445 products available on websites of seven retailers and 2 location-specific duplicate retailers were collected for FLIP 2020. Of 57,006 food and beverage products available on seven retailers, nutritional composition data were available for about 60% of the products and ingredients were available for about 45%. Data for energy, protein, carbohydrate, fat, sugar, sodium and saturated fat were present for 54-65% of the products, while fiber information was available for 37%. Food products were classified under multiple categorization systems, including Health Canada's Table of Reference Amounts, Health Canada's sodium categories for guiding benchmark sodium levels, sugar-focused categories and categories specific to various global nutrient profiling models. CONCLUSIONS: FLIP is a powerful tool for evaluating and monitoring the Canadian food supply environment. The comprehensive sampling and granularity of collection provides power for revealing analyses of the relationship between nutritional quality and marketing of branded foods, timely observation of product reformulation and other changes to the Canadian food supply.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.011 | 0.015 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".