Improved First-Principles Model of Differential Mobility Using Higher Order Two-Temperature Theory
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Differential mobility spectrometry is a separation technique that may be applied to a variety of analytes ranging from small molecule drugs to peptides and proteins. Although rudimentary theoretical models of differential mobility exist, these models are often only applied to small molecules and atomic ions without considering the effects of dynamic microsolvation. Here, we advance our theoretical description of differential ion mobility in pure N2 and microsolvating environments by incorporating higher order corrections to two-temperature theory (2TT) and a pseudoequilibrium approach to describe ion-neutral interactions. When comparing theoretical predictions to experimentally measured dispersion plots of over 300 different compounds, we find that higher order corrections to 2TT reduce errors by roughly a factor of 2 when compared to first order. Model predictions are accurate especially for pure N2 environments (mean absolute error of 4 V at SV = 4000 V). For strongly clustering environments, accurate thermochemical corrections for ion–solvent clustering are likely required to reliably predict differential ion mobility behavior. Within our model, general trends associated with clustering strength, solvent vapor concentration, and background gas temperature are well reproduced, and fine structure visible in some dispersion plots is captured. These results provide insight into the dynamic ion–solvent clustering process that underpins the phenomenon of differential ion mobility.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".