Periodic/Aperiodic parameterization of transient oscillations (PAPTO)–Implications for healthy ageing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two techniques for analyzing human extracranial neurophysiological signals, namely the periodic/aperiodic parameterization of neural power spectra and the transient events framework of oscillatory activity, have recently emerged in the scientific literature. In this work, we integrate these two analysis perspectives to analyze extracranial neurophysiological signals as a series of transient rhythmic events disambiguated from the background aperiodic activity. We call this novel technique the periodic/aperiodic parametrization of transient oscillations (PAPTO). We demonstrate PAPTO by investigating resting-state sensorimotor magnetoencephalography recordings from the Cambridge Center for Ageing and Neuroscience cross-sectional study on healthy ageing (n = 600, ages 18-88). We show that PAPTO is more sensitive to neocortical transient beta rhythms compared to more conventional transient event detection algorithms and captures more variance in the resting-state occurrence rate of beta events across participants. The improved sensitivity of PAPTO reveals that the beta occurrence rate almost doubles over the adult lifespan which we discuss in terms of thalamocortical beta generation in the somatosensory cortex and the age-related decline of sensory perception.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".