MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210729143 · doi:10.4000/rfcb.9018

Patrice Bouche, Shirley Doulière et Margaret Gillespie (dir.), La place des femmes dans l’espace public, 1800-1939, Grande- Bretagne, Irlande, Empire

2022· article· fr· W4210729143 on OpenAlexaff
Véronique Molinari

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue française de civilisation britannique · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsHistorical Studies in Education
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmpireArtHistoryAncient history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Depuis les années 60 et l’émergence de l’historiographie féministe, les relations hommes-femmes dans l’Angleterre victorienne et édouardienne n’ont eu de cesse d’être représentées comme basées sur une stricte division entre sphère privée et sphère publique. Cette approche binaire, ignorant non seulement la multiplicité des expériences mais également la porosité des frontières entre ces sphères, si elle a pu se révéler être un outil d’analyse très utile, a néanmoins depuis une vingtaine d’ann...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.163
Threshold uncertainty score0.324

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0070.007
Scholarly communication0.0080.008
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0050.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue française de civilisation britanniqueSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207