MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210738190 · doi:10.1093/jopart/mut057

Editorial Board

2013· paratext· en· W4210738190 on OpenAlexafffund
Kenneth J. Meier, Bradley R. E. Wright, H Frederickson, Amanda Rutherford, Rhys Andrews, Stephanie Moulton, Sonia Ospina, René Torenvlied, David Van Slyke, Mary Feeney, Agnes Akkerman, Anna A. Amirkhanyan, Christopher Ansell, Eduardo Araral, David Arellano Gault, Claudia N. Avellaneda, Frances Stokes, Anthony Michael Bertelli, John Bohte, Sandford Borins, Geert Bouckaert, Stuart Bretschneider

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory · 2013
Typeparatext
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicDiverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersBinghamton UniversityYonsei UniversityUniversity of ExeterYork UniversityMacalester CollegeUniversity of OklahomaUniversity of WashingtonArizona State UniversityUniversity of MissouriHarvard UniversityVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityUniversiteit AntwerpenOhio State UniversityLondon School of Economics and Political SciencePontificia Universidad Católica de ChileSeoul National UniversityGeorgia Institute of Technology
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.029
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.277
Threshold uncertainty score0.927

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.029
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0110.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0050.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2770.229

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.113
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Public Administration Research and TheorySame topicDiverse Scientific and Economic StudiesFrench-language works237,207