Improving Safety and Outcomes After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Single-Center Experience
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The implementation of dual T-cell depletion comprising 4.5 mg/kg of antithymocyte globulin (ATG), post-transplantation cyclophosphamide, and cyclosporine A for reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) independent of donor source in 2015 significantly improved graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) control at our Institution. Further advances were made between 2017 to 2020 in supportive care of allogeneic HCT recipients and were the subject of this study, with 651 adults included. Transplant outcomes were compared between patients who underwent transplantation during Period 1 (2017-2018) and Period 2 (2019-2020). Main changes implemented during the study period were reduction of ATG dose from 4.5 to 2 mg/kg in matched unrelated donor transplants, abandoning of dual T-cell depletion in matched related donor transplants, combining dual T-cell depletion with myeloablative conditioning for selected patients, and reduction of the target therapeutic cyclosporine level from 200 to 400 ng/L to 150 to 250 ng/L. Other improvements included addition of ursodiol until day 100, implementation of a double responsible physician model, and personalized patient supportive care plan focused on activity and calorie intake. The reduction in intensity of GVHD prophylaxis provided comparable acute GVHD and moderate-severe chronic GVHD between both time periods. Altogether the described improvements in transplant methodology and supportive care showed that compared to Period 1, patients transplanted in Period 2 had superior 1-year overall survival, relapse-free survival, and non-relapse mortality and showed a trend toward better GVHD- and relapse-free survival, without an increase in relapse risk. This study reports the results of outcomes-directed improvements in transplantation design, GVHD prophylaxis, and supportive care, highlighting how transplantation outcomes can be improved through careful modifications in response to meticulously monitored outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".