MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210749142 · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.751126

Health Effects of Metabolic Risks in the United States From 1990 to 2019

2022· article· en· W4210749142 on OpenAlexaff
Ruifang Chen, Saeid Safiri, Masoud Behzadifar, Jude Dzevela Kong, Mohamed Sami Zguira, Nicola Luigi Bragazzi, Wen Zhong, Weiru Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Public Health · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Hunan ProvinceInstitute for Health Metrics and EvaluationBill and Melinda Gates Foundation
KeywordsMedicineEnvironmental healthBurden of diseaseBody mass indexDisease burdenMetabolic syndromeDiseasePublic healthBlood pressureObesityDemographyPopulationInternal medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Metabolic risks including high body mass index, high fasting plasma glucose, high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high systolic blood pressure, kidney dysfunction and low bone mineral density, contribute heavy burden to the US health systems. We aimed to investigate the burden attributable to metabolic risks in the US from 1990 to 2019. METHODS: Using methodology of Global Burden of Disease Study, the deaths and DALYs attributable to metabolic risks were analyzed by age, gender, states, Socio-demographic Index (SDI) and diseases from 1990 to 2019 in the US. RESULTS: In 2019, the age-standardized death and DALY rates attributable to metabolic risks were 174.9 and 4738.7 per 100,000 people, accounting for 33.1% and 18.2% of death and DALY rates from all causes in the US, and there was a decrease by -32.5% and -21.2% in age-standardized death and DALY rates since 1990. The burden attributable to metabolic risks increased with age, and was higher in males than females. In addition, the burden varied widely across the states, generally in inverse proportion to the SDI levels, and the heaviest burden was observed in East and West South-Central of the US. Cardiovascular diseases carried heavy burden attributable to metabolic risks. CONCLUSION: The burden attributable to metabolic risks remained major public health concerns in the US. Prevention of metabolic risks should be a high priority in the US.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score0.173

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Public HealthSame topicDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsFrench-language works237,207