High-Q TeO2–Si Hybrid Microring Resonators
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present the design and experimental measurement of tellurium oxide-clad silicon microring resonators with internal Q factors of up to 1.5 × 106, corresponding to a propagation loss of 0.42 dB/cm at wavelengths around 1550 nm. This compares to a propagation loss of 3.4 dB/cm for unclad waveguides and 0.97 dB/cm for waveguides clad with SiO2. We compared our experimental results with the Payne–Lacey model describing propagation dominated by sidewall scattering. We conclude that the relative increase in the refractive index of TeO2 reduces scattering sufficiently to account for the low propagation loss. These results, in combination with the promising optical properties of TeO2, provide a further step towards realizing compact, monolithic, and low-loss passive, nonlinear, and rare-earth-doped active integrated photonic devices on a silicon photonic platform.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".