MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210770729 · doi:10.2196/preprints.14705

Acupuncture to Improve Symptoms for Stable Angina (AIMS-A): Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial (Preprint)

2019· preprint· en· W4210770729 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Judith M. Schlaeger, Hui Yan Cai, Alana Steffen, Verónica Angulo, Adhir Shroff, Joan Briller, Debra Hoppensteadt, Glorieuse Uwizeye, Heather Pauls, Miho Takayama, Hiroyoshi Yajima, Nobuari Takakura, Holli A. DeVon

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcupuncture Treatment Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRandomized controlled trialAcupuncturePhysical therapyMcGill Pain QuestionnaireAnalgesicQuality of life (healthcare)Traditional Chinese medicineAlternative medicineInternal medicineAnesthesiaVisual analogue scale

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND Acupuncture has demonstrated physiologic analgesic effects in Chinese patients with stable angina. One proposed mechanism of action for analgesic effects is the downregulation of M1 macrophages, Interleukin-1β, Interleukin-6, Interleukin-18, and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α). OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study is to test a 10-session, 5-week acupuncture treatment protocol as a complementary therapy for symptoms of stable angina for American patients, who vary from Chinese patients in healthcare systems and other salient variables. METHODS We are conducting a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of 69 adults (35 assigned to initial acupuncture and 34 to an attention control condition) with a medically confirmed diagnosis of stable angina, whose pain and associated symptoms have not been controlled to their satisfaction with guideline-directed medical management. Participants in the experimental group will receive a standardized Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) point prescription. The attention control group will view non-pain-related health education videos over 5 weeks equal to the 10 hours of treatment for the acupuncture group. Participants will complete the McGill Pain Questionnaire and the Seattle Angina Questionnaire-7, as well as have inflammatory cytokines measured at baseline and study completion. Primary outcomes are anginal pain and quality of life. RESULTS Results will be available upon completion of the randomized controlled trial and the analysis of the data. CONCLUSIONS We will generate data on feasibility, acceptability, effect sizes, and protocol revisions for a future fully powered RCT of the protocol. Findings will help determine if patients with persistent ischemic symptoms experience a pro-inflammatory state and/or hyperalgesia caused by multiple neural and immune processes not always relieved with medication. CLINICALTRIAL ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02914834

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.027
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.101
Threshold uncertainty score0.336

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0270.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0100.005
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0060.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1010.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.395
Teacher spread0.368 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAcupuncture Treatment Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207