A Convolutional Neural Network Approach for Estimation of Li-Ion Battery State of Health from Charge Profiles
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Intelligent and pragmatic state-of-health (SOH) estimation is critical for the safe and reliable operation of Li-ion batteries, which recently have become ubiquitous for applications such as electrified vehicles, smart grids, smartphones, as well as manned and unmanned aerial vehicles. This paper introduces a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based framework for directly estimating SOH from voltage, current, and temperature measured while the battery is charging. The CNN is trained with data from as many as 28 cells, which were aged at two temperatures using randomized usage profiles. CNNs with between 1 and 6 layers and between 32 and 256 neurons were investigated, and the training data was augmented with noise and error as well to improve accuracy. Importantly, the algorithm was validated for partial charges, as would be common for many applications. Full charges starting between 0 and 95% SOC as well as for multiple ranges ending at less than 100% SOC were tested. The proposed CNN SOH estimation framework achieved a mean average error (MAE) as low as 0.8% over the life of the battery, and still achieved a reasonable MAE of 1.6% when a very small charge window of 85% to 97% SOC was used. While the CNN algorithm is shown to estimate SOH very accurately with partial charge data and two temperatures, further studies could also investigate a wider temperature range and multiple different charge currents or constant power charging.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it