MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210779381 · doi:10.1111/echo.15309

A rare case of giant left circumflex coronary artery fistula to coronary sinus in patient with persistent left superior vena cava and bicuspid aortic valve

2022· article· en· W4210779381 on OpenAlexaff
Rami M. Abazid, Aashish Goela, Ali Islam, Sarah Blissett

Bibliographic record

VenueEchocardiography · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCoronary Artery Anomalies
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyInternal medicinePersistent left superior vena cavaBicuspid aortic valveCoronary sinusEjection fractionStenosisAortic sinusCardiogenic shockCardiac magnetic resonance imagingInferior vena cavaRight coronary arteryHeart failureMagnetic resonance imagingArteryRadiologyMyocardial infarctionCoronary angiography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 61-year-old male presented with symptoms of decompensated heart failure and cardiogenic shock. Transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography showed severely impaired left ventricular (LV) systolic function (LVEF of 20-25%), bicuspid aortic valve with moderate aortic insufficiency and no significant stenosis, dilated coronary sinus and a tortuous vascular structure in the left-sided atrioventricular groove. Cardiac computed tomography confirmed the diagnosis of persistent left superior vena cava and a giant coronary artery fistula to the coronary sinus. Cardiac magnetic resonance illustrated non-specific late gadolinium enhancement in the mid-wall of the septum. The patient was treated medically and with cardiac re-synchronization therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0050.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEchocardiographySame topicCoronary Artery AnomaliesFrench-language works237,207