MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210782274 · doi:10.1353/mlr.2003.0305

Quebec National Cinema by Bill Marshall

2003· article· en· W4210782274 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tony Simons

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Modern Language Review · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMovie theaterPoliticsNational identityMedia studiesSociologyArt historyHistoryLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

47? Reviews by summarizing: 'ainsi, c'est le pere qui constitue la force motrice de la poetique de Modiano' (p. 200), but this does not detract fromthe originality ofthe study as a whole. University of Warwick Akane Kawakami Quebec National Cinema. By Bill Marshall. Montreal, London, and Ithaca: McGill-Queen's University Press. 2001. xi + 37ipp. ?46 (pbk ?19.95). ISBN 0-7735-2103-8 (pbk 0-7735-2116-x). As Bill Marshall states in his firstchapter, there is no doubt that Quebec cinema is a 'national cinema'. The problem is that, in Quebec, the term 'national' is so charged with political, cultural, and social connotations, in which one perception of national identity is set against another, that there can be no single, accepted definition of it, and consequently no 'master' or 'national' reading of a film. Marshall sets out to resolve this problem by constructing a methodology that enables him to reconcile the evidence ofthe filmtexts, and their undisputed foundation in the concept of 'nation', with the multiple levels of actual and potential reading. He explores Fredric Jameson 's approach that rejects the inadequacies of 'one-to-one homologies' and a 'master hermeneutic', and which stresses discontinuities and polysemia, and develops a 'mo? bile spiral' of arguments, each weaving wider and deeper, allowinghim to explore the competing and varied discourses on nationhood in all their fullness and openness. Marshall writes from a position of substantial knowledge and research not only on francophone film,but also on the language of culture and politics. By limiting his work mostly to Quebec fictional feature films, he is able to engage in the widest possible debate, ranging, for example, across the problematic 'national/allegorical tension' of Quebec/France, the shifting and ambiguous relationship between personal/national identity and gender, a questioning ofthe notion of 'auteurism' within the specificities of Quebec film-making, indeed all the contradictions and fault-lines inherent in any construction of the term 'nation' or 'people' in the context of Quebec cinema. The work is comprehensive in its detail and, as Marshall says in his preface, it may 'help as a reference work' (p. ix), but it is much more than that, opening up Quebec cinema to major, current theoretical and critical debates. Marshall's exploration of Pierre Perrault's Pour la suite du monde is typical of his method. He begins where others leave off,summarizing the established debates about 'le direct', the fabrication of a fiction,and the relationship between identity and the past, but he then extends the debate via the Frankfurt School to the paradoxes of Gilles Deleuze's analysis of the film, to Nietzsche, Felix Guattari, and then on to Claude Jutra's A tout prendre to test his ideas in a differentcontext. Even more interesting is the chapter on 'Popular Cinema', a subject that tends to be glossed over in normal reference works. A comparison here between Marshall's approach to Pierre Falardeau's Elvis Gratton and that of Yves Lever in his standard reference work Histoiregeneraledu cinema au Quebec (Montreal: Boreal, 1995) highlightsthe dif? ferences. Lever makes seven separate references to the film,but they are short, and two repeat the information concerning its success as a rented film. Marshall not only gives information, but he puts it into a wider theoretical base, enabling him to delve into the Lacanian mirror phase and an investigation into the ambivalent perception of 'us' and 'not us' that is at the heart of popular Quebec identity as condensed in le quetaine. This is an invigorating work that challenges many assumptions and received opin? ions. I occasionally feltthe need for subsections to divide one set of arguments from another, but that is the nature of the mobile spiral, and in fact the strength of Mar? shall's approach. Divisions are inimical to it. Marshall has succeeded in breaking through established readings and fixed positions, and in opening up whole news ways MLR, 98.2, 2003 471 of understanding Quebec cinema. The work is essential reading for all those who wish to understand more about Quebec national cinema, and who want to engage in an open debate about it. University of Reading Tony Simons The Art and Genius...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.448
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Modern Language ReviewSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207