MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210783124 · doi:10.3390/sym14020320

Condition Monitoring of Rolling Bearing Based on Multi-Order FRFT and SSA-DBN

2022· article· en· W4210783124 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jie Ma, Shule Li, Xinyu Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueSymmetry · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsFault (geology)Bearing (navigation)Computer scienceDeep belief networkArtificial intelligenceNoise (video)Pattern recognition (psychology)Feature (linguistics)SIGNAL (programming language)Fractional Fourier transformFilter (signal processing)Fourier transformControl theory (sociology)AlgorithmDeep learningComputer visionMathematicsFourier analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Owing to the symmetry of the rolling bearing structure and the rotating operation mode, the rolling bearing works in a complex environment. It is very easy to be submerged by noise and misdiagnosis. For the non-stationary signal in variable speed state, this paper presents a condition monitoring method based on deep belief network (DBN) optimized by multi-order fractional Fourier transform (FRFT) and sparrow search algorithm (SSA). Firstly, the fractional Fourier transform based on curve feature segmentation is used to filter the fault vibration signal and extract the fault feature frequency. Then, the fault features are input into the SSA-DBN model for training, and the bearing fault features are classified, identified, and diagnosed. Finally, the rotating machinery fault simulator in the laboratory of Ottawa University is taken as the practical application object to verify the effectiveness of the method. The experimental results show that the proposed method has higher recognition accuracy and stronger stability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.526
Threshold uncertainty score0.570

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSymmetrySame topicMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207