MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210788374 · doi:10.1109/tec.2022.3146547

Two-Segment Magnet Transverse Flux Ferrite PM Generator for Direct-Drive Wind Turbine Applications: Nonlinear 3-D MEC Modeling and Experimental Validation

2022· article· en· W4210788374 on OpenAlexaff
Reza Nasiri‐Zarandi, Mohammad Sedigh Toulabi, Ahmadreza Karami-Shahnani

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Motor Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlux linkageMagnetFinite element methodNonlinear systemEngineeringTurbineWind powerMechanical engineeringElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringPhysicsStructural engineeringVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transverse flux PM generator (TFPMG) is a capable option for direct-drive wind turbine (DDWT) applications due to its high-power characteristics at low speeds. NdFeB-based TFPMGs may suffer from a higher total cost and lower thermal capabilities compared to the ferrite-based TFPMGs. Not yet covered in the existing literature, in this paper a transverse flux ferrite PM generator (TFFPMG) is proposed, designed, and modeled, which can also resolve the unipolar flux generation and even-order harmonics in the flux linkage of the conventional TFPMGs that occurred in conventional TFPMGs through its innovative two-segment trapezoidal shape magnet structure. Due to the 3-D flux path nature in the proposed TFFPMG, either 3-D finite element analysis (FEA) or 3-D magnetic equivalent circuit (MEC) modeling should be used. As a computationally efficient modeling method, a nonlinear 3-D MEC is established to model the entire structure of the TFFPMG while the core saturation and nonlinear permeances are also fully considered to improve the modeling accuracy. The electromagnetic performance of the proposed TFFPMG modeled by 3-D MEC in various loading conditions is validated by both 3-D FEA and experimental results using a 2.5 kW TFFPMG. A close agreement between 3-D MEC modeling predictions, 3-D FEA, and test results confirms the reliability of the MEC modeling for the proposed TFFPMG.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.917
Threshold uncertainty score0.951

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Energy ConversionSame topicElectric Motor Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207