Osteoarthritis Data Integration Portal (OsteoDIP): A web-based gene and non-coding RNA expression database
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OsteoDIP aims to collect and provide, in a simple searchable format, curated high throughput RNA expression data related to osteoarthritis. Datasets are collected annually by searching “osteoarthritis gene expression profile” in PubMed. Only publications containing patient data and a list of differentially expressed genes are considered. From 2020, the search has expanded to include non-coding RNAs. Moreover, a search in GEO for “osteoarthritis” datasets has been performed using ‘Homo sapiens' and ‘Expression profiling by array’ filters. Annotations for genes linked to osteoarthritis have been downloaded from external databases. Out of 1204 curated papers, 63 have been included in OsteoDIP, while GEO curation led to the collection of 28 datasets. Literature data provides a snapshot of osteoarthritis research derived from 1924 human samples, while GEO datasets provide expression for additional 1012 patients. Similar to osteoarthritis literature, OsteoDIP data has been created mostly from studies focused on knee, and the tissue most frequently investigated is cartilage. GEO data sets were fully integrated with associated clinical data. We showcase examples and use cases applicable for translational research in osteoarthritis. OsteoDIP is publicly available at http://ophid.utoronto.ca/OsteoDIP. The website is easy to navigate and all the data is available for download. Data consolidation allows researchers to perform comparisons across studies and to combine data from different datasets. Our examples show how OsteoDIP can integrate with and improve osteoarthritis researchers’ pipelines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".