MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210811954 · doi:10.1109/tie.2022.3146539

Capacitor Pre-Charge Method for Back-to-Back Seven-Level Hybrid Clamped Converter Without Extra Power Supply

2022· article· en· W4210811954 on OpenAlexafffund
Hao Tian, Mingzhe Wu, Yunwei Li

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMultilevel Inverters and Converters
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCapacitorConvertersInrush currentResistorElectronic circuitElectrical engineeringOvervoltageVoltageElectronic engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringTransformer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multilevel converters with floating capacitors generally require precharging to build up the voltage on floating capacitors and dc-link before the normal operation. In particular, precharge is challenging for converters with overvoltage concerns under initial zero capacitor voltages. As a promising topology, seven-level hybrid clamped (7L-HC) converters also require precharge of capacitors and shall avoid high voltage stress during the precharge. Considering the high cost of deploying extra dedicated precharge circuits in a medium voltage system, the precharging method without relying on dedicated power supplies is favored. In this article, specific switching states and their corresponding selection schemes are designed to precharge floating capacitors of back-to-back 7L-HC converters. In this process, the inrush current and voltage stress can always be limited in the safe range. This method only needs series and shunt resistors typically already exist in practical converter circuits, resulting in low cost and ease of implementation. The design method of the resistances is also provided. Both simulation and experimental results validate the feasibility of this method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Industrial ElectronicsSame topicMultilevel Inverters and ConvertersFrench-language works237,207