MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210813384 · doi:10.12976/jib/2022.31.1.2

Description of the female of Pelecinobaccha portachueloi Miranda, 2014 (Diptera: Syrphidae)

2022· article· en· W4210813384 on OpenAlexaffabout
Gil Felipe Gonçalves Miranda

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Insect Biodiversity · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicDiptera species taxonomy and behavior
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerminologyZoologyBiologyHumanitiesGenealogyLinguisticsArtHistoryPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Data text: Pelecinobaccha was reviewed by Miranda et al. (2014), where the species Pelecinobaccha portachueloi Miranda, 2014 in Miranda et al. 2014 was described based on a single male. Further study of material deposited at the Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes (CNC) revealed a female specimen that keys out and fits the description of the male of P. portachueloi and is from the same locality (Miranda et al., 2014). This short note aims on describing the female and imaging it (Figs. 1–7). Terminology follows Miranda et al. (2020).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.099
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.149 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Insect BiodiversitySame topicDiptera species taxonomy and behaviorFrench-language works237,207