Combined effects of microencapsulated essential oils and irradiation from gamma and X-ray sources on microbiological and physicochemical properties of dry fermented sausages during storage
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Essential oils (EOs) or EOs encapsulated in alginate and alginate-cellulose nanocrystal combined with 1.5 kGy X-ray (0.76 kGy/h) or γ-ray (6.37 kGy/h) irradiation were applied on dry fermented sausages (DFS). Microbiological quality was tested in terms of the reduction of Escherichia coli O157:H7 cocktail, Listeria monocytogenes, molds and yeasts, lactic acid bacteria (LAB), and total mesophilic bacteria (TMF) during storage at room temperature (20 ± 1 °C) for 8 weeks. Physicochemical quality was tested by following the changes of texture and color of sausages. Synergistic effects were observed with combined treatments with γ-irradiation on inhibiting E. coli O157:H7 cocktail and LAB and with X-ray on inhibiting E. coli O157:H7 cocktail. Extensive inhibition of L. monocytogenes, molds and yeasts, and TMF was also noticed during storage. Antimicrobial formulations combined with γ-irradiation did not show adverse effects on texture and color of sausages while treatment with X-ray resulted in the reduction of redness and increase of hardness. However, the differences of texture were eliminated during storage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it