Wake behind a discontinuous cylinder: unveiling the role of the large scales in wake growth and entrainment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The turbulent flow in the wake of a discontinuous cylinder (DC) was investigated. The DC geometry consisted of cylinder segments $5D$ long (with $D$ being the diameter of the cylinder) separated by gaps of width $2.5D$ . Particle image velocimetry and hot-wire anemometry were used to analyse the flow at two Reynolds numbers, $Re = 4000$ and $10\,000$ , for $x/D \le 180$ . Large eddy simulations for both the DC and the infinite continuous cylinder (CC) wakes were also carried out at $Re = 10\,000$ . The DC configuration was devised to trigger the shedding of horseshoe vortices (HSV) in the very-near-wake region with the intent of illustrating the role that these three-dimensional HSVs, previously identified in the far-wake region of CC, play in the entrainment process in turbulent wakes. The DC geometry produced HSVs by the interaction between the high momentum flow through the gaps and the main spanwise vortex shed behind each cylinder segment, while in the CC wake they evolve from near-wake instabilities straddled with hairpin vortices that detach spanwise vorticity from the shed Kármán vortices. The DC wake was found to grow and spread in the transverse direction with a much faster rate than for the CC wake, up until approximately $x/D \approx 50$ . Prior to this location, the enhanced growth rate caused by the shear-aligned HSV led to a wake width of approximately 3 times that of the CC wake, with a maximum mean velocity deficit that was approximately half.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".