SSK-ICS LoRa: A LoRa-Based Modulation Scheme With Constant Envelope and Enhanced Data Rate
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Long-range (LoRa) modulation is an orthogonal modulation scheme that uses linearly-modulated up chirps to represent information bits. Its constant envelope and good bit-error-rate performance make it one of the key players in establishing low-power wide-area networks for the Internet of things applications. However, LoRa modulation has low data rates. In this letter, we propose a new constant-envelope modulation scheme, named slope-shift-keying and interleaved-chirp spreading (SSK-ICS) LoRa modulation, that can deliver higher data rates than the conventional LoRa modulation scheme. Succinctly, the proposed SSK-ICS-LoRa modulation uses up chirps, down chirps, interleaved up chirps and interleaved down chirps to expand the signal set and hence can carry more bits per transmission symbol. For the same spreading factor and bandwidth consumption, the proposed scheme is able to improve the data rate of the conventional LoRa scheme up to 28.6%. We also present the optimal maximum-likelihood detectors for both coherent and non-coherent demodulators for the proposed scheme. Simulation results show that the proposed scheme outperforms LoRa modulation in both data rate and bit-error rate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".