MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210842141 · doi:10.11646/phytotaxa.533.2.4

Pluteus aesontiensis (Agaricales, Pluteaceae) a new species in sect. Celluloderma

2022· article· en· W4210842141 on OpenAlexaff
Francesco Dovana, Alfredo Justo, GIULIANO FERISIN

Bibliographic record

VenuePhytotaxa · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyAgaricalesPileusStipe (mycology)TaxonPhylogenetic treeCladeTaxonomy (biology)BotanyZoologyEvolutionary biologyMushroom

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pluteus aesotiensis sp. nov. is described based on several collections from northeast Italy. Phylogenetic analyses of the ITS region place this new species in sect. Celluloderma (/cinereofuscus clade). Morphologically P. aesotiensis is characterized by the combination of a brown, reddish brown to deep yellowish brown pileus, sometimes rugulose at center, globose to broadly ellipsoid spores, fusiform to broadly fusiform pleurocystidia, and clavate caulocystidia present only in the apical part of the stipe. The nrITS phylogenetic analysis supports this taxon as a new species. The description is illustrated with photographs of the basidiomes in habitat and photographs of the main microscopic features.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.257
Threshold uncertainty score0.976

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhytotaxaSame topicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant InteractionsFrench-language works237,207