MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210870062 · doi:10.26508/lsa.202000807

MMD-associated <i>RNF213</i> SNPs encode dominant-negative alleles that globally impair ubiquitylation

2022· article· en· W4210870062 on OpenAlexafffund
Abhishek Bhardwaj, Robert S. Banh, Wei Zhang, Sachdev S. Sidhu, Benjamin G. Neel

Bibliographic record

VenueLife Science Alliance · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMoyamoya disease diagnosis and treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Cancer InstituteCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsUbiquitin ligaseSingle-nucleotide polymorphismUbiquitinGeneticsBiologyAlleleGeneMolecular biologyGenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in RNF213 , which encodes a 591-kD protein with AAA+ ATPase and RING E3 domains, are associated with a rare, autosomal dominant cerebrovascular disorder, moyamoya disease (MMD). MMD-associated SNPs primarily localize to the C-terminal region of RNF213 , and some affect conserved residues in the RING domain. Although the autosomal dominant inheritance of MMD could most easily explained by RNF213 gain-of-function, the type of ubiquitylation catalyzed by RNF213 and the effects of MMD-associated SNPs on its E3 ligase activity have remained unclear. We found that RNF213 uses the E2-conjugating enzymes UBE2D2 and UBE2L3 to catalyze distinct ubiquitylation events. RNF213-UBED2 catalyzes K6 and, to a lesser extent, K48-dependent poly-ubiquitylation in vitro, whereas RNF213-UBE2L3 catalyzes K6-, K11-, and K48-dependent poly-ubiquitylation events. MMD-associated SNPs encode proteins with decreased E3 activity, and the most frequent MMD allele, RNF213 R4810K , is a dominant-negative mutant that decreases ubiquitylation globally. By contrast, MMD-associated RNF213 SNPs do not affect ATPase activity. Our results suggest that decreased RNF213 E3 ligase activity is central to MMD pathogenesis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.857

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLife Science AllianceSame topicMoyamoya disease diagnosis and treatmentFrench-language works237,207