TAL: Topography-Aware Multi-Resolution Fusion Learning for Enhanced Building Footprint Extraction
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Automatic building footprint extraction from remote sensing imagery is a challenging task with important applications in geomatics and environmental science. Significant advances have been made in this field as a result of the emergence of deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) designed for semantic segmentation. Although CNNs have demonstrated state-of-the-art performance in coarse annotation and identification of buildings, the accuracy of extracted building footprints is still insufficient for high-precision applications such as mapping and navigation. We propose the topography-aware multi-resolution fusion learning strategy tailored to the problem of enhanced building footprint extraction. More specifically, we introduce a topography-aware loss (TAL) for enhancing a deep CNN’s ability to learn heterogeneous building features for better boundary preservation during segmentation. We then incorporate the proposed TAL loss within a multi-resolution fusion architecture to boost high-resolution segmentation performance. Finally, we introduce a novel metric named average thresholded contour accuracy (tCA) which specifically measures the accuracy of segmentation boundaries. The experimental results on the SpaceNet buildings dataset show significant improvements in boundary integrity of extracted building footprints when compared with previously proposed methods. Hence, this method enables accurate boundary annotation toward automatic production of building footprint maps for high-precision applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it