MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210876429 · doi:10.1097/nnd.0000000000000822

The Impact of Preceptor Education, Experience, and Preparation on the Role

2022· article· en· W4210876429 on OpenAlexaff
Joan Insalaco Warren, Mary G. Harper, Ryan MacDonald, Beth Ulrich, Dawn Whiteside

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal for Nurses in Professional Development · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicNursing Roles and Practices
Canadian institutionsCanadian Nurses Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPreceptorProfessional developmentMedical educationPsychologyPerceptionNursingMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Findings from the 2020 Association for Nursing Professional Development National Preceptor Practice Analysis study validated the Ulrich precepting model. This secondary data analysis examines the influence of preceptor training, experience, and education on perceptions of the importance of the preceptor roles, domains (knowledge and practice), and required competencies. Preceptor training compared with education and experience best predict nurses' perceived importance of precepting and its seven roles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.035
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.035
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.497
Teacher spread0.463 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal for Nurses in Professional DevelopmentSame topicNursing Roles and PracticesFrench-language works237,207