Nonlinear analysis of single pile settlement based on stress bubble fictitious soil pile model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Taking both pile end stress diffusion effect and pile‐soil interface softening effect into account, a new nonlinear method for the vertical settlement of pile is proposed in this paper. In detail, a new model, namely stress bubble fictitious soil pile model, is proposed to simulate the support from the pile bottom soil. The nonlinear soil softening model is introduced to establish the relationship between unit pile shaft friction and pile‐soil relative displacement. Then, a nonlinear calculation method for load‐settlement analysis in multilayered soil is developed with the integration of these two models. The validity and accuracy of the proposed method are verified through the comparisons against experimental and existing simplified methods. At last, a detailed parametric study is conducted to assess the influence of the parameters related to the proposed model and pile‐soil system on the load‐displacement behavior of single pile. The promotion of this method could hugely boost the prediction of the single pile settlement for the preliminary design of pile foundation in layered soil.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".