E. Association Business and Dispatch from Montréal
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: FROM THE PRESIDENT: “Increasing Anthropology's Visibility: A New Public Education Project” by Leith Mullings WORLD ANTHROPOLOGIES: “Revitalising the IUAES” by Junji Koizumi and Andrew “Mugsy” Spiegel TRACES, TIDEMARKS AND LEGACIES: “Montréal Dazzles: 2011 AAA Annual Meeting Program Chair Report” by Sarah Green. Sarah Green is a contributing editor of “Traces, Tidemarks and Legacies,” the 2011 Executive Program Chair's column in Anthropology News. “Cultural Ambassadors Wave their Flag in Montréal” by Giuseppe De Cesare “AAA Business Meeting” by Kim Baker “AAA Executive Board Actions: November 16 and 19, 2011” “Anthropologists Reflect on Arab Spring: Report about “Revolution in the Middle‐East and North Africa: Anthropological Perspective” by Émilie Sarrazin “New Student Perspective at the 2011 Meeting” by Alice Walker “My Coffee with Michel: Visiting Occupiers between Panels in Montréal” by D Archie Frink “Gillian Tett's “Anthropology, Policy, and the Global Financial Crisis” Interest Group for the Anthropology of Public Policy 2011 Distinguished Lecture” by Marianne Butler “Global Climate Change: New AAA Task Force Takes on Quintessentially Anthropological Issue” by Shirley Fiske and Sarah Strauss. Keywords: public education, world anthropology, AAA annual meeting, AAA business meeting, AAA board action, Arab Spring, occupy movement, public policy, climate change
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it