Gastric dysfunction in patients with chronic nausea and vomiting syndromes defined by a novel non-invasive gastric mapping device
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Importance Chronic nausea and vomiting syndromes (NVS) are prevalent and debilitating disorders. Putative mechanisms include gastric neuromuscular disease and dysregulation of brain-gut interaction, but clinical tests for objectively defining gastric motor function are lacking. Objective A novel medical device enabling non-invasive body surface gastric mapping (BSGM) was developed and applied to evaluate NVS pathophysiology. Design A case-control study where BSGM was performed in NVS patients and matched controls using Gastric Alimetry (Alimetry, New Zealand), comprising a conformable high-resolution array (8×8 electrodes; 20 mm inter-electrode spacing), wearable Reader, and validated symptom logging App. Continuous measurement encompassed a fasting baseline (30 min), 482 kCal meal (10 min), and 4-hr post-prandial recording. Setting Multicenter study in Auckland, New Zealand and Calgary, Canada. Participants 43 NVS patients (gastroparesis and Rome IV chronic NVS) and 43 matched controls. Main outcomes and measures Symptom severity and quality of life were measured using Patient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Disorders-Symptom Severity Index (PAGI-SYM), Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI), and Patient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Disorders-Quality of Life (PAGI-QOL) instruments. Health psychology metrics included the State Trait Anxiety Inventory Short Form (STAI-SF) and Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) questionnaires. Spectral analyses including frequency, amplitude, and fed-fasting power ratio. Spatial biomarker analyses included spatial frequency stability and average spatial covariance. Results Meal responses were impaired in NVS, with reduced amplitudes compared to controls (median 23.3 vs 38.0 µV, p<0.001), impaired fed-fasting power-ratios (1.1 vs 1.6, p=0.02), and disorganized slow-waves (spatial frequency stability 13.6 vs 49.5; p<0.001). However, two distinct NVS subgroups were evident with indistinguishable symptoms (all p>0.05). A majority (62%) had normal BSGM studies (all biomarkers non-significant vs controls) with increased psychological comorbidities (43.5% vs 7.7%; p=0.03) and anxiety scores (median 16.5 vs 13.0; p=0.035). A smaller subgroup (31%) had markedly abnormal BSGM, with test biomarkers correlating with symptoms (nausea, pain, excessive fullness, early satiety, bloating; all r>0.35, p<0.05). Conclusions and Relevance NVS patients share overlapping symptoms, but comprise distinct underlying phenotypes as revealed by a novel BSGM device. These phenotypes correlate with symptoms, which should inform clinical management and allocations into therapeutic trials. Key Points Question How does body surface gastric mapping, a novel non-invasive medical device for evaluating gastric motility, aid assessment of patients with chronic nausea and vomiting. Findings Two subgroups were revealed in chronic nausea and vomiting syndromes, which could not be differentiated by symptoms alone. Where body surface gastric mapping was normal, symptoms correlated with psychological comorbidities, and where body surface gastric mapping was abnormal, symptoms correlated with gastric electrophysiology metrics. Meaning Distinct phenotypes revealed by body surface gastric mapping correlate with symptoms, which should inform targeted clinical management and allocations into therapeutic trials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".