MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210918352 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2022.3148722

Joint Device Pairing, Reflection Coefficients, and Power Control for NOMA Backscatter Systems

2022· article· en· W4210918352 on OpenAlexaff
Farhad Dashti Ardakani, Rui Huang, Vincent W. S. Wong

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBackscatter (email)Mathematical optimizationComputer scienceTransmitter power outputPairingPower (physics)MaximizationConvex optimizationOptimization problemMultiplexingAlgorithmElectronic engineeringMathematicsWirelessTelecommunicationsRegular polygonEngineeringTransmitterPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) and backscatter communication are two emerging technologies for low-power communication. In this paper, we consider a NOMA backscatter system, where signals from two backscatter devices are multiplexed on a frequency resource block using NOMA in each time slot. Our objective is to maximize the average energy efficiency by optimizing backscatter device pairing, reflection coefficients of backscatter devices, and the transmit power of the reader. We formulate the average energy efficiency maximization problem subject to the minimum circuit power and the minimum data rate requirements of the backscatter devices, and the transmit power constraint of the reader. The formulated problem is nonconvex. To obtain a suboptimal solution for this problem, we use alternating optimization technique and decompose the problem into two subproblems. The subproblems are solved by using fractional programming, Dinkelbach’s algorithm, and successive convex approximation method. Simulation results show that our proposed algorithm converges quickly to a suboptimal solution. Our proposed algorithm outperforms several baseline algorithms, including the genetic algorithm, fixed device pairing scheme, conventional device pairing scheme, maximum transmit power allocation scheme, and random reflection coefficient selection scheme, in terms of the average energy efficiency. The optimality gap of our proposed algorithm is investigated by comparing with the optimal scheme, in which the optimal device pairing is obtained based on exhaustive search.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.807
Threshold uncertainty score0.930

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologySame topicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless NetworksFrench-language works237,207