Metaphyseal and posterior rib fractures in osteogenesis imperfecta: Case report and review of the literature
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Metaphyseal corner fractures and posterior rib fractures are thought to only occur in settings of inflicted injury. We describe a case of siblings who presented with metaphyseal corner fractures and multiple posterior rib fractures who were later found to carry FKBP10 mutations, a rare cause of Osteogenesis Imperfecta (OI) known as Bruck syndrome. This clinical presentation led to a literature review examining fracture types in OI and inflicted injury. A 15-month-old male presented with multiple healing fractures of varying ages including posterior rib and metaphyseal corner fractures with no history of significant trauma. He had joint laxity, short stature and Wormian bones. His diagnosis of Bruck Syndrome led to investigations in his sibling at birth, which demonstrated the same fracture pattern including multiple posterior rib and metaphyseal corner fractures. They both had pathogenic compound heterozygous FKBP10 variants. We performed a literature review evaluating the fracture pattern in cases investigated for inflicted injury and found to have OI. Fourteen articles reported 78 children with OI initially diagnosed as inflicted injury. Of these children, 71 (91%) were diagnosed with milder forms of OI (Sillence type I and IV). Sixty-four children (81%) had clinical signs of OI including blue sclera, dentinogenesis imperfecta, short stature, joint laxity and limb bowing. Fifteen (19%) children had fractures of high specificity for inflicted injury including metaphyseal corner fractures and posterior rib fractures and 58 (74%) had fractures of moderate specificity for inflicted injury such as bilateral fractures and fractures of different ages. Metaphyseal corner fractures and posterior rib fractures are highly associated with inflicted injury, but they have been reported in children with OI. Bruck syndrome, a rare and severe form of OI can present with metaphyseal and posterior rib fractures, including at birth. When features of OI are present in children with metaphyseal corner fractures and/or posterior rib fractures are present, genetic testing may be warranted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".