MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210941005 · doi:10.1109/lpt.2022.3150231

2D Constellation Distortion for Subduing Equalization Noise in Bandwidth- Limited IMDD Systems

2022· article· en· W4210941005 on OpenAlexaff
Essam Berikaa, Md Samiul Alam, Maxime Jacques, Xueyang Li, Ping-Chiek Koh, David V. Plant

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Photonics Technology Letters · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDistortion (music)Intersymbol interferenceBandwidth (computing)Computer scienceBit error rateEqualization (audio)AlgorithmElectronic engineeringTelecommunicationsDecoding methodsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bandwidth-limited IMDD systems suffer from the noise boosted by the strong equalization at the receiver. This letter proposes a multiplication-free approach that reduces the impacts of the equalizer-enhanced colored noise through time-interleaving the received symbols and distorting the two-dimensional (2D) constellation such that the noise correlation is subdued. The 2D distortion map is predefined and retrieved from a look-up table. The proposed 2D constellation distortion is evaluated after the linear feed-forward equalizer and Volterra nonlinear equalizer. Experimental results show a BER reduction of 40% when the 2D constellation distortion is employed after the equalizer for the 135 Gbaud PAM4 and 110 Gbaud PAM6 signals. Owing to the proposed approach, we transmit a net data rate of 250 Gbps/$\lambda $PAM4 and PAM6 in the O-band over 2 km of SSMF at a BER of$3.8\times 10^{-3}$below the 6.7% overhead HD-FEC using a 47 GHz SiP modulator, linear equalization, and the proposed 2D distortion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Photonics Technology LettersSame topicOptical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207