MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210979307 · doi:10.1353/nin.2012.0017

No Man’s Land

2012· article· en· W4210979307 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
David Walsh

Bibliographic record

VenueNine · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAmerican Sports and Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLuckOfficerHistoryPoetryState (computer science)DowntownArchaeologyArt historyLawArtPolitical scienceTheologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

No Man’s Land David Walsh (bio) [Erratum] I closed my eyes and swung, leaving success to the dumb luck of round wood meeting round ball. It traveled untouched, just the right arc over Rodney’s outstretched mitt at second base, ending in the weeds between second and right center. I was, and this was my only hit in two years of Little League, that purgatory of faded flannel handed down through the ages with names like Giants and Yankees and Braves stitched across our chests, corners of the letters picked away by years of bored fielders. Rodney still farms land across the valley, digging a living out of upstate hills. His fields are just as plentiful, the milk just as rich, as that day we faced each other across the thin grass infield, scratching out runs from walks and errors. Today, bovine milking factories cast large shadows from other valleys, and my faded line drive still falls just outside Rod’s reach, his feet inches off the dusty baseline, the victim of blind circumstance on a fenced field carved out of the valley. [End Page 101] David Walsh David Walsh has spent his career working for state and local government. He is currently serving as Chief Information Officer at the New York State Education Department. He published his first poem in 2011. Copyright © 2012 University of Nebraska Press

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.139
Threshold uncertainty score0.466

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1390.063

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNineSame topicAmerican Sports and LiteratureFrench-language works237,207