Least Squares Twin Support Vector Machines to Classify End-Point Phosphorus Content in BOF Steelmaking
Bibliographic record
Abstract
End-point phosphorus content in steel in a basic oxygen furnace (BOF) acts as an indicator of the quality of manufactured steel. An undesirable amount of phosphorus is removed from the steel by the process of dephosphorization. The degree of phosphorus removal is captured numerically by the ‘partition ratio’, given by the ratio of %wt phosphorus in slag and %wt phosphorus in steel. Due to the presence of multitudes of process variables, often, it is challenging to predict the partition ratio based on operating conditions. Herein, a robust data-driven classification technique of least squares twin support vector machines (LSTSVM) is applied to classify the ‘partition ratio’ to two categories (‘High’ and ‘Low’) steels indicating a greater or lesser degree of phosphorus removal, respectively. LSTSVM is a simpler, more robust, and faster alternative to the twin support vector machines (TWSVM) with respect to non-parallel hyperplanes-based binary classifications. The relationship between the ‘partition ratio’ and the chemical composition of slag and tapping temperatures is studied based on approximately 16,000 heats from two BOF plants. In our case, a relatively higher model accuracy is achieved, and LSTSVM performed 1.5–167 times faster than other applied algorithms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".