MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4210982454 · doi:10.1017/9781108275439.003

The Law Does Its Work

2018· book-chapter· en· W4210982454 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
R. J. M. Blackett

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2018
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRace, History, and American Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuman settlementSettlement (finance)GeographyArchaeologyChoseRural settlementFrontierSouth carolinaHistoryRural areaLawPolitical sciencePublic administration

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Long before the passage of the Fugitive Slave Law, the enslaved chose to leave the places and the people they knew, in numbers that could only be guessed at, in search of the unknowns of freedom among strangers in black communities scattered throughout the North and in Canada. They created new lives for themselves among free blacks and other fugitive slaves in cities, towns, and rural hamlets. Those from the Shenandoah Valley of Virginia, for instance, found refuge in black rural settlements in Washington County, and another south of Meadville, Pennsylvania, as well as jobs in the booming economy of Pittsburgh. Those from the northern counties of Maryland headed for the relative safety and anonymity of Philadelphia, Harrisburg, and York. From the eastern districts of Maryland, Virginia, and North Carolina, they headed to such cities as New York, Boston, and New Bedford, Massachusetts, and places in between. They decamped from northern Kentucky to Cincinnati, and Columbus, Ohio, and further north to the small towns and cities that lined the Great Lakes from Chicago and Detroit in the west to Buffalo, Rochester, and Syracuse in the east. Others chose to stay closer to the places they knew in the relative safety of a black rural settlement with a strong Underground Railroad network near Ripley, Brown County, Ohio, just across the river from Kentucky. In 1850, there were reputed to be forty black settlements in the state. Settlements, some established by Quakers in eastern Indiana, drew slaves both from Kentucky and North Carolina. One historian has estimated that there were roughly sixty black settlements in the state by the outbreak of the Civil War. Some of these would disband after the passage of the law, only to be reestablished further north in the state and even further afield in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Canada. Slaves from Missouri headed for black rural settlements in western Illinois, such as the one at Rocky Fork near Alton and to Chicago further north. One distraught delegate to the Illinois State Constitutional Convention that passed a series of draconian laws banning blacks from entering the state pointed to a number of “little settlements” of blacks in the Egypt district of southern Illinois, an area notorious for its unwillingness to tolerate the presence of blacks, but in which, he remarked, fugitive slaves from Missouri found comfort and protection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.047
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.216

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.047
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0130.028
Scholarly communication0.0250.016
Open science0.0030.011
Research integrity0.0190.020
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0650.041

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCambridge University Press eBooks→Same topicRace, History, and American Society→French-language works237,207→