Monocular Temporal Hemianopia due to Acute Zonal Occult Outer Retinopathy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Retinal disease may mimic an optic neuropathy since both may result in a relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD), and retinal abnormalities may not be evident on a clinical exam. We report a case of a young woman with a monocular temporal hemianopia respecting the vertical meridian due to acute zonal occult outer retinopathy (AZOOR). This 34-year-old woman presented with a 10-day history of left eye vision loss and was found to have a visual acuity of 20/20 in both eyes, a left RAPD, and left temporal hemianopia on Humphrey 24-2 SITA-Fast visual field testing. Dilated fundus examination showed a normal-appearing optic nerve and retina in both eyes. She had already had a normal magnetic resonance imaging of the orbits with contrast and retinal disease was suspected. Optical coherence tomography showed dropout of the ellipsoid zone in the peripapillary retina, and fundus autofluorescence showed hyper-autoflourescence in the peripapillary region of the left eye. A diagnosis of AZOOR was made, and no improvement with prednisone occurred at final follow-up. This case demonstrates the importance of multimodal imaging in patients referred for optic neuropathies since retinal disease such as AZOOR can produce visual field defects characteristic of optic nerve disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".